Dear Archbishop,
I sat in the RSEC, simply as a member of that generation in which you have hope. This time of youth is as empowering as you described. My heart cheered for you at your praise. Thank you.
You described the work of my generation - giving, saving lives, supporting those most in need. It is all true. What about those that my generation is helping?
They are people whose humanity has been utterly neglected. Their real names, “brother and sister,” have been replaced with any title that lessens their human identity. They suffer, and so do we when we do nothing to lift them up.
You called out the evil that lies to the world and declares people to be less than human. You called the evil by name - ageism, sexism, racism, homophobia, elitism.
All people underestimated, hated and reduced to base creatures by these poisonous movements are to be once again recognized as humans, deserving of dignity. All was well within me, and yet ...
Your words, though both wise and endearing, are but words now to me. Once again, there is someone who has been left out. Crestfallen - that is my state. The denial of humanity continues. Do you not know? In all your venerable work and humanitarianism, you too have forgotten another of our brothers and sisters.
Hungry children, thirsty children, suffering children - none of them deserve their fate. In fact, they all deserve the help and protection of those with strength and means. Pre-born children - where do they fall? Is their fate any less of a responsibility of those with strength and means?
Now, you did not deny the humanity of pre-born children, but you did not affirm it. Instead, you chose to blanket all those opposed to their destruction as people “willing to kill” for this cause. The fanaticism of a few wayward activists does not equate to the undeniable intentions of the Nazi Holocaust or the Ku Klux Klan. Yet, why did you place them in the same context?
This young person’s heart sank deeply at your words. This young person, whom you praised for idealism, has only to live up to that. This young person is willing to work, engage, speak, defend and persist until all humanity is confessed. There are others much better than I who do the same. You did much the same yourself, no?
Why do you not open wide the doors to all? Why must we continue to work all the longer to regain the worth of all?
There are idealist young people who dream and strive for a day to come. On that day, someone will be asked to speak to the people, much like you, Archbishop. They will speak about these times we live for now. They will talk about the betrayal of human beings by their own kind, and the audience will be stunned within themselves, wondering how it could have been so.
Yet, they will smile to hear the words of conviction that give full dignity to ALL PEOPLE. Hearts will rise as those recognized will include the poor, the hungry, women, men, the elderly, the suffering, those different, the dying, the stranger and those who live within the womb of their mother.
No one will be omitted, excluded, denied, discounted or deemed unworthy. They will speak great truths, and the crowd will cheer without reserve.
The Murray State News > Opinion
Archbishop’s speech omits one key group: unborn babies
Published: Thursday, February 25, 2010
Updated: Thursday, February 25, 2010










11 comments Log in to Comment
And here: "That, in and of itself, speaks volumes about his 'give or take' respect for the lives of pre-born persons"Anonymous assumes all agree with his or her idea of what constitutes life. To Anonymous, I ASSUME, conception equates life, but once again this is assumably just an assumption of Anonymous. Anonymous is probably what one would consider a "Bible thumper," but once again not all people, even Christians, hold this idea to be true. You are part of a minority around the world who believe that these "pre-born" are legitimately people already.
I myself am a Christian, but I don't believe that Christians can push their beliefs on those who don't believe in our morals. Christians simply cannot say, "This is right, because it's what I believe, and thus you also must live by it despite your lack of belief." We, as Christians, cannot expect those who don't believe to live up to "Christian morals" when we are divided amongst ourselves to this issue.Anonymous states that Desmond Tutu cannot possibly respect all life the same, but once again not everyone is in concurrence with when life begins. I would like to state as well that Desmond Tutu never laid claim to perfection, and that is what it would take to 'respect all life the same.' No one respects all life the same.Yes, this letter consists of Reding's opinion, and she has every right to voice it, especially in the Opinions section of the Murray State News. I, however, also have a right to voice my opinion via lovely text response, and I simply cannot justify your criticism of someone who has dedicated his life to humanitarian efforts solely because of his lack of pro-life agenda.Fight your own fight for the pro-life campaign; don't bring down others while trying to do that.If I have inferred your meaning incorrectly at all, I apologize.
You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now